For an Initial Consultation, call (917) 371-8000

Steven Mitchell
Sack

The Employee’s Lawyer®

Welcome to The Law Offices of Steven Mitchell Sack

Enforcing the workplace rights of thousands of employees, executives and sales reps for more than 44 years.

steven mitchell sack

The “Snowflake Test”: Is It Legal?

snowflakeWhile it is not uncommon for employers to give assessment tests to potential job candidates, one U.S. company has caught the eye of the media for its unusual vetting tool. Kyle Reyes, Chief Executive Officer of The Silent Partner Marketing, a public relations firm located in Hilliard Mills, Connecticut, created the controversial “snowflake test” as a means of weeding out candidates who don’t fit the company’s culture – specifically, “overly sensitive, liberal candidates that are too easily offended.” However, despite the significant publicity and, in some cases, praise, others have fiercely criticized the assessment and called into question the ethics and legality of it.

According to Mr. Reyes, a “snowflake” is an individual who “is going to whine and complain” and will not bring anything to the table except “an entitled attitude and an inability to back their perspective.” The 30-question snowflake test includes questions such as:

  • What should the minimum wage be?
  • How often should employees get raises?
  • How do you feel about guns?
  • What are your feelings about employees or clients carrying guns?
  • How do you feel about the police?
  • What are your feelings about “safe spaces” in a challenging work environment?
  • What does faith mean to you?
  • You see someone stepping on an American flag. What do you do?

According to Mr. Reyes, the “snowflake test” reveals the types of job candidates the company is seeking: conservative, pro-American, pro-Second Amendment applicants. The company has been able to use the “snowflake test” to eliminate 60 percent of interviewees. Anyone who is not pro-American or pro-Second Amendment is automatically disqualified from the position, according to Mr. Reyes. The CEO’s efforts have been praised by conservative media outlets such as Fox Business and he claims that other businesses have reached out to him with questions on how to implement similar vetting tests in their own hiring process.

However, the “snowflake test” has faced significant criticism and some have questioned the test on an ethical and legal level. Under the laws enforced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, pre-employment tests are permitted as long as they are not designed, intended or used to discriminate against an applicant based on their race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age, disability and genetic information.

A legal issue may arise if the “snowflake test” causes disparate impact, disproportionately excluding people based on a protected category, where the test is not “job-related or consistent with business necessity.” Is the “snowflake test” job-related or consistent with business necessity? According to Mr. Reyes, it is. His reasoning as to why there are multiple questions about firearms on the test is that the company frequently works with police and first responders and does a lot of work filming with guns, according to Ragan.com.

If the “snowflake test” is job-related or consistent with business necessity, can someone who is challenging the selection process show that there is a less discriminatory alternative available? Criteria Corp, a web-based HR technology and pre-employment testing company, states that the “snowflake test” lacks the scientific data to back up its validity to predict performance on the job. What about those who argue that the “snowflake test” is unlawfully biased based on political affiliation? Although states may also offer additional protections against employment-related discrimination, including political affiliation, only the District of Columbia, Mississippi, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Wisconsin protect political affiliation.

When it comes to pre-employment assessments, they can be used as an effective means of finding the best candidate for the job if they abide by the letter of the law. Unfortunately, this is not always the case and, every year, many job applicants are subjected to discrimination during the pre-hiring process. For the last three decades, Steven Mitchell Sack, “The Employee’s Lawyer,” has represented individuals in unfair employee discrimination cases, including matters that relate to the pre-hiring process. If you have been a victim of employment discrimination, contact our New York employment discrimination law office at 917-317-8000 for more information or to schedule a consultation.

    If you have experienced any of the below, fill out the form to the right to set up your FREE PHONE CONSULTATION:























    What’s Happening at The Law Offices of Steven Mitchell Sack

    new york lawyer
    new york lawyer awards
    new york lawyer blog

    Our Reviews and Client Feedback

    I dealt with steven as an adversary. I found him to be one of the most respectful,, knowledgeable, and effective attorneys i have encountered in my 40 years of practicing law.
    Steven isn't just a great lawyer, he is a great person. He was always available to take my calls, and to give good advice. I would highly recommend him.
    "I am an attorney, and I can say that Mr sack did an outstanding job in negotiating a severance agreement. He picked up the phone and made a call, something simple, timely and effective that no other attorney would do. Mr. Sack was effective, to the point, he always followed up, and he got me a better result than any other attorney would have.

    He exceeded expectations, and I am very grateful that I hired him.

    I would recommend him to any employee involved in a sensitive situation where diplomatic negotiation and communication is needed. He kept me very well informed about the progress of my case and obtained a very satisfactory negotiated formal written severance agreement, which is one of his specialties."
    Response from the owner:Thank you very much for your review. Please keep us in mind if you ever have any other employment law matters you need assistance with.
    The best contract lawyer out there. Responsive compassionate and got results results fast. Unbelievable contract lawyer best in NYC.
    Response from the owner:Thanks for your review. Please feel free to call back if you ever have any need of representation in any future employment law matters.
    I had the pleasure of working with Steven on my separation agreement, and I couldn’t be more grateful for his expertise and dedication. From the very beginning, he provided clear, strategic guidance, ensuring that my rights were fully protected. He took the time to answer all my questions, kept me informed at every step, and negotiated effectively on my behalf. His attention to detail and deep understanding of employment law helped me secure an exceptional outcome. I highly recommend Steven!
    Response from the owner:Thank you for your review. We are glad you were satisfied with your representation, and hope you contact us if you ever have need of representation again.
    I had a great experience working with Steven Sack recently relating to a recent job separation from my former employer. He is straight to the point, very knowledgeable, and easy to work with. I absolutely recommend his services to anyone that needs an employment attorney.
    Response from the owner:Thanks for your review. If you ever need any future counsel on employment law matters, please feel free to contact us again.
    js_loader

    Testimonials

    Read More

    Skip to content